• Share this text:
Report Abuse
OH HOT DAMN THIS IS MY JAM - posted by guest on 21st May 2020 01:28:09 AM

On Leedskalnin: The Invisible Theory according to F.C.McGriff

''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

Many of you may have heard about Edward Leedskalnin's descriptor for a

generator magnetic field consisting of 'North Poles' and 'South Poles'

'flowing against eachother'.


Fred McGriff wants you to know that this theorem is a glass-cake, because,

while it COULD be true (and it COULD BE PROVEN FALSE NUMERICALLY USING VINES),

it can always be functionally replaced by the Right Handed Rule (as per all

physics known to human kind). But what did Leedskalnin really say? Fred loves

to tell people stuff.


What Leedskalnin is saying prevents most people from understanding a basic

'magnet'. To understand a magnet, you actually need to understand what charge

'is' and 'why charge exists and flows'. This isnt actually simple, because it

is all seeped in mathematical latin terminology. Unfortunately, Fred is

pretty fluent in Latin-math all of the time, so here we go!


A charge is actually a blob of goo whose existence fades far from the center

via a 'per r-squared' rule. In the middle, the charge is just a blob of

reactive goo. The goo endlessly diffuses its components, like beer fermenting,

and reacts them upon eachother, like beer formenting, and you end up with

four styles of 'blob': 'proton', 'electron', 'neutron', and 'photon'.


Photons are the hardest to imagine, so stick with the simpler ones till it

starts clicking. For a proton blob, we have an inverted distribution with

regard to an electron blob. If components A and B are high density, while

component C is low density, for a proton; and electron has low density A

and B with high density C, because it is statistically inverted while

being a blob. Because of how the blobs react with eachother, they will

BEGIN TO APPEAR TO MOVE AROUND FOLLOWING THE RULES OF CALCULUS, and will

do this AS LONG AS THE RULES THAT MEAN THEY EMULATE CALCULUS ARE ENFORCED.


What this means it two things: a quratz crystal has such great timing, don't

think too hard about it unless a nuclear bomb goes off, cuz too much energy

is too much energy. In the middle is me, you, Leedskalnin and Fred.


Once you can imagine blobs of goo, the next step is what will lead you to

understanding a photon. Inside of this goo there is a second solution you

can form. You can form a wave in the goo that will never stop advancing,

and you can shape the wave so that it never stops advancing cyclically,

passing through its starting position. Think of it like a tube-tornado.

Once you can see your tube tornado spinning around without changing, apply

just BARELY some RIGHT HANDED CLOCKING and you are looking at the magnetic

field that is formed around every piece of charge.


That is correct. All charges, including the chargeless neutron, ALSO CARRY

A MAGNEIIC TORNADO, AND ALL PHOTONS CARRY A MAGNETIC TORNADO THAT GETS

hopelessly deformed. Please don't get hung up on imagining photons, because

they will not generate anti-gravity like magnetic fields will generate

anti-gravity. Now, lets take a look at what Leedskalnin 'thought of', and

see if we need to keep paying attention to it.


Leedskalnin has gone ahead and called the magnetic wave I just escribed to

you a 'North Pole' and states that it is flowing INTO 'South Poles' that

flow in the opposite direction. Lets make up a wave-system and then call

it a 'North-Pole style system'. We have a wave of high A and B with low C

moving upwards and also to the right. The trough of this wave will be

low A and B with high C, moving upwards and also to the right.


Now lets make up a completely different wave out of some additional

components D,E, and F. No matter how you set this up, if D E and F

do not immediately modify A, B, and C then they can locally 'coexist'

like adding a wrinkle on top of a second wrinkle such that I have two

wrinkles, and I have summed them together like addition. These waves,

however they are made, out of D, E, and F, form peaks and troughs that

are flowing downard, and also to the right.


That is correct. He drew a picture of two spirals on top of eachother,

and the right handed coil we can call the magnets we know, and the left

handed magnets are waves Leedskalnin is simply stating 'exists too'. He

states that these waves existence is coupled and that you cannot escape

one wave-train without the second wave-train existing on top of it.


TECHNICALLY: this may be true and could be real. EMPIRICALLY: he is not

giving us a reason for the second wave-train, or a methodology for testing

for it's existence. Most magnetics can be EFFORTLESSLY DESCRIBED by computing

solenoids that are right-handed ALL OF THE TIME. Flipping the handedless of

your coil actually flips the current direction relative the core on a slice

plane and reversing the provided current flow builds a RIGHT-HANDED MAGNET

ANYWAY, YOU CHILD MOLESTING MOTHER FUCKING SHIT-FED NIGGERS IN A TIN CAN.


Barely apologizing for the ignorance of an ET. With the internet down here

along with the Markovian Parallax Denigrate, humans in deep space dont know

what I just told you and harrassed me while typing this document. Sorry for

the random tangent. Fred loves disgusting, amoral inclusions.


What Leedskalnin offers as a descriptor, isn't necessary. Modling all

magnets as wave-trains traveling in a donut fashion and modeling them

all as RIGHT HANDED (like ur fucking DNA, nigger) will tell you how to

assemble most anything humans have built down to the nano-molecular

level. Eventually, you will not be able to ensure you are measuring

your experimental metrics, and it washes out at laser beams, micro-waves,

steel, plastic, and pills.


Thats it. There are no poles. Leedskalnin polarized his brain huffing

feces in a cave and Leedskalnin probably shitted and pissed on all

of his equipment (to non-linearize it) until it was doing a thing he

cannot actually explain. Then he said 'north poles flow into south poles

and that the poles are small, smaller than a photon'. THAT SENTANCE IS

A MOTHER FUCKING LIE. Magnetic waves ARE NOT A PRTICLE, they are a

disturbance in the ether. As they flow, they disturb the ether such

that you measure the resulting magnetic field, and that is it.


Modifying 'the reluctance of a piece of metal' means this: most metals

form with their magnetic tornados RANDOMLY ASSEMBLED RANDOMNIFICALLY,

AT RANDOM. If you APPLY THE RIGHT STIMULUS TO THE METAL BAR, all of the

tornados decide, inside of the ether, which you can numerically model

ON A COMPUTER ONLY, decide they are not going to exist at random, and

they REALIGN THEMSELVES SUCH THAT THE CENTER FLOWS ALL LINE UP IN

PARALLEL. Booooooom. Magnet, mother fucker. Most metals cannot crystalize

in this manner, and will forget it was a good idea and relax to the

randomnific state if you turn the stimulus off. If they dont, you just

empirically fabricated a magnet laboratorially, like an industrial

magnet supplier.


Mother Fuck edward leedskalnin For the Rest of My Fucking Life.

Report Abuse

Login or Register to edit or copy and save this text. It's free.